Fact Sheet |
FS 31/02/06 |
Accumulation of salts in the root zone can have drastic effects on the growth and yield of horticultural crops. Further information on salinity impacts and managing soil salinity is contained in other PIRSA Fact Sheets (see Further Reading section at the end of this fact sheet).
Soil salinity has three adverse impacts:
The main factors causing high soil salinity levels are:
Salinity is commonly measured by measuring the electrical conductivity (EC).of soil water or saturated paste extract. EC is measured in deciSiemens per metre
(dS/m), which is equivalent to 1000 EC units. Soil water can be extracted by two techniques:
A. SoluSAMPLER™ Method
The SoluSAMPLER ™ is a n inexpensive device for extracting soil water and hence allows monitoring soil salinity throughout the season and hence adjustments can be made to irrigation management.
It is recommended that the SoluSAMPLER ™ be installed in nests of three, positioned at depths of 30cm, 60cm and 90cm at the representative site within 15cm of a dripper (when dripper spacing is 60cm) or within the wetting zone of a sprinkler. More than one set will enhance the quality of data. Alternately, the SoluSAMPLER ™ should be buried in middle of active root zone eg. 50cm for perennial crops (citrus, vines), and at 25cm for shallower rooted annual crops (vegetables). Soil water is drawn from the surrounding soil and into the ceramic cup (under vacuum), extracted by syringe, and the salinity (termed hereafter as ECsw) measured easily with a simple portable EC meter.
Soil salinity interpretation standards for the SoluSAMPLER ™ are given in Tables 3 and 4. The SoluSAMPLER ™ was developed by SARDI. For more information see the Further Reading section at the end of this fact sheet. If the soil is too dry, SoluSAMPLER™ will not yield sample. For dry soils, soil sampling method B will be required to measure salinity.

The soil sample method requires simple tools such as a shovel or soil sampling auger, and no prior equipment purchase or setup. Since however this method is only done once or twice a year and requires a laboratory analysis. It may deliver salinity information when the damage is done, and there is also analysis cost by to consider.
a. Where to Sample
Deciding where to soil sample is dependent on the reason for sampling. There are several situations which may require different methods. For example:
b. When to Sample
Areas proposed for redevelopment or development should be sampled well before planting, so that soil amendments (eg. gypsum) can be spread, and leaching irrigations applied if necessary. Problem areas should be sampled as soon as possible when the problems are identified, so that remedial action can be applied. An ongoing sampling program is recommended to identify forthcoming problems before they affect crop growth and yield. Appropriate sampling times are late spring and autumn.
c. How to Sample
Soil samples are generally taken using a hand auger at depths of 25, 50, 75 and 100 cm, for perennial crops, (eg. citrus, vines), and at 10, 25 and 50 cm for shallower rooted annual crops (eg. vegetables). The sample depth can be changed for individual situations.
About 500 grams of soil is required for the test. The samples should preferably be transported in plastic bags (paper bags become soggy and break) with the grower name, sampling position, depth and date clearly marked on the bag, using a waterproof marker pen.
The samples should be transported to the laboratory as soon as practical to prevent any chemical changes occurring. The bags of soil can be sent to the Analytical Crop Management Laboratory (ACML) or private laboratories for analysis of soil salinity (specify the saturation paste extract method).
Soil salinity is normally related to the EC of the aqueous soil extracts, eg saturated soil-pastes (hereafter termed as ECe). Crop tolerance to salinity is generally expressed as ECe. ECsw measured by SoluSAMPLER ™ was found to be twice that of the ECe.
A general salt tolerance level measured for various horticultural crops expressed as ECsw of samples extracted by SoluSAMPLER ™ is reported in Table 1. Table 2 shows the relative salt tolerance of grape vines. The Tables show the approximate soil salt content of the SoluSAMPLER ™ sample (expressed as the ECsw in dS/m), where 0, 25 and 50 percent yield decreases may be expected.
These critical values should be used as a guide only because ECsw may require adjustment depending on agronomic management, irrigation salinity, soil moisture content, variety, soil type and leaching efficiency.
The ECe value is widely used as a measure of soil salinity because it is a reproducible value that is directly proportional to the salt concentration of the soil water. The ECe value can be evaluated against the criteria presented in Table 3 to assess the general level of crop tolerance for a particular irrigation situation.
A list of the relative salt tolerances of common horticultural cops is provided in Table 4. The Table shows the approximate soil salt content, expressed as the ECe (dS/m), where 0, 10, 25 and 50 percent yield decreases may be expected. This table is also meant as a general guide only.
Table 1: Soil salinity thresholds (ECsw in dS/m) for selected horticultural crops1
|
Crop |
Soil water salinity threshold (ECsw) in dS/m |
||
|
0% yield loss |
25% yield loss |
50% yield loss |
|
|
Orange |
3.4 |
6.6 |
9.6 |
|
Grapefruit |
3.4 |
6.6 |
9.6 |
|
Lemon |
3.4 |
6.6 |
9.6 |
|
Apricot |
3.2 |
5.2 |
7.4 |
|
Peach |
3.4 |
5.8 |
8.2 |
|
Carrot |
2.0 |
5.8 |
9.2 |
|
Onion |
2.4 |
5.6 |
8.6 |
|
Potato |
3.4 |
7.6 |
11.8 |
|
Tomato |
5.0 |
10.0 |
15.0 |
1 Modified after Ayers and Westcot (1985)
Table 2: Soil salinity thresholds (ECsw in dS/m) for winegrapes1, 2, 3
|
Salinity tolerance |
Variety or rootstock |
Soil salinity threshold (ECsw) in dS/m |
||
|
0% yield loss |
25% yield loss |
50% yield loss |
||
|
sensitive to moderately sensitive |
Own roots (Vitis vinifera): eg. Sultana, Shiraz, Chardonnay Rootstocks: |
3.6 |
8.8 |
14.0 |
|
moderately tolerant tolerant |
Rootstocks: |
6.6 |
11.8 |
17.0 |
1 ECsw modified from Zhang et al. (2002)
2 A general rate of reduction for wine grapes is assumed (9.6% for each additional 1dS/m), based on Tanji & Kielen (2003)
3 Thresholds are based upon point measurements of soil ECsw (eg taken post harvest), and do not account for changes in soil salinity or crop salinity tolerance at different growth stages. Data is based on 5-6 year duration field trials and do not take into account longer term responses. It should be noted that some grapevine rootstocks eg K51-40 are particularly salt-sensitive and should be avoided.
Table 3: General guide to soil salinity thresholds (ECe in dS/m)
|
Soil salinity threshold (ECe dS/m) |
Interpretation |
|
0 - 2 |
Salinity effects mostly negligible |
|
2 - 4 |
Yields of very sensitive crops may be restricted |
|
4 - 8 |
Yields of many crops restricted |
|
8 - 16 |
Only tolerant crops yield satisfactorily |
|
16 + |
Only a very few tolerant crops yield satisfactorily |
Table 4: Soil salinity thresholds for selected horticultural crops (ECe) in dS/m1
|
Crop |
Soil salinity threshold (ECe dS/m) |
|||
|
0% yield loss |
10% yield loss |
25% yield loss |
50% yield loss |
|
|
Almond |
1.5 |
2.0 |
2.8 |
4.1 |
|
Avocado |
1.3 |
1.8 |
2.5 |
3.7 |
|
Citrus |
1.7 |
2.3 |
3.3 |
4.8 |
|
Date Palm |
4.0 |
6.8 |
11.0 |
18.0 |
|
Lucerne |
2.0 |
3.4 |
5.4 |
8.8 |
|
Olive |
2.7 |
3.8 |
5.5 |
8.4 |
|
Onion |
1.2 |
1.8 |
2.8 |
4.3 |
|
Pistachio |
4.0 |
4.5 |
5.0 |
6.0 |
|
Pomefruit |
1.7 |
2.3 |
3.3 |
4.8 |
|
Potato |
1.7 |
2.5 |
3.8 |
5.9 |
|
Stonefruit |
1.7 |
2.2 |
2.9 |
4.1 |
|
Tomato |
2.5 |
3.5 |
5.0 |
7.6 |
|
Vine |
1.5 |
2.5 |
4.1 |
6.7 |
1 Adapted from Ayers and Westcot (1985)
Ayers, RS & Westcot, DW 1985, Water Quality for Agriculture, Irrigation and Drainage Paper 29 Rev. 1, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome.
Tanji, KK & Kielen, NC 2003, Agricultural drainage water management in arid and semi-arid areas, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 61, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome.
Zhang et al 2002, 'Yield-salinity relationships of different grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) scion-rootstock combinations', Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 8:150-156.
Irrigated Crop Management Service (ICMS) & Analytical Crop Management Laboratory (ACML)
Rural Solutions SA, Primary Industries & Resources SA (PIRSA), Loxton Research Centre, PO Box 411, Loxton South Australia 5333. Phone: 08 8595 9100.
SARDI Water Resources & Irrigated Crops, Waite Research Precinct, GPO Box 397, Adelaide SA 5001. Phone: 08 8303 9400.
SoluSAMPLER ™ was developed by Dr Tapas Biswas of the South Australian Research & Development Institute (SARDI) see http://www.sardi.sa.gov.au/pdfserve/water/products_and_services/swe_web.pdf
and marketed by Sentek Sensors Technologies, Stepney SA http://www.sentek.com.au
Managing Salinity with Restricted Allocations in the South Australian Riverland (PIRSA Fact Sheet No. 04/07)
Salinity impacts of low Murray River flows in the South Australian Riverland (PIRSA Fact Sheet No. 05/07) http://www.pir.sa.gov.au/pirsa/drought/irrigation__and__water_management/salinity_management
Water Budgeting Guidelines (PIRSA Fact Sheets for selected horticulture crops)
Water Budgeting & Water Trade Decisions Tools (PIRSA Spreadsheets) http://www.pir.sa.gov.au/pirsa/drought/irrigation__and__water_management/water_budgeting_and_water_trade_decision_tools
Drought Strategy Checklist (PIRSA Fact Sheet 19/06)
Irrigating Horticulture Crops with Reduced Water Supplies (PIRSA Fact Sheet 18/06) http://www.pir.sa.gov.au/pirsa/drought/irrigation__and__water_management/irrigated_crop_information
Business Decision Making Tool (PIRSA Spreadsheet) http://www.pir.sa.gov.au/pirsa/drought/irrigation__and__water_management/business_decision_making_tool
Irrigators Toolkit, Latest River Murray Information, Government Assistance and Support http://www.pir.sa.gov.au/pirsa/drought/irrigation__and__water_management

Last update: November 2007
Agdex: 200/561
Author: Tony Adams, Irrigated Crop Management Service (ICMS) – Rural Solutions SA; Tapas Biswas & Mark Skewes, South Australian Research and Development Institute (SARDI).
Disclaimer
Use of the information in this Fact Sheet is at your own risk. The Department of Primary Industries and Resources and its employees do not warrant or make any representation regarding the use, or results of the use, of the information contained herein in terms of its suitability, correctness, accuracy, reliability, currency or otherwise. The entire risk of the implementation of the information which has been provided to you is assumed by you. All liability or responsibility to any person using the information is expressly disclaimed by the Department of Primary Industries and Resources and its employees.
| Monitoring soil salinity for irrigated horticulture |
ISSN 1323-0409
|